Get Posts via Email

  • Subscribe to BSHAW
    Enter your Email


    Powered by FeedBlitz

RSS / XML Feed

May 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

« Tier Two Paid Search Syndication - bad traffic, worse businesses | Main | INSP, MIVA, LOOK, INCX withered - whither Marchex? »

Irrelevant Traffic Arbitrage

Marchex bulls would lead you to believe that traffic to their domains is organic and relevant.  I am sure some of it is.

However, it appears that Marchex (or an affiliate) is abusing Google AdWords and exploiting Yahoo by arbitraging traffic.  There are ads on relatively inexpensive words on Google and that direct clickthroughs to unrelated highly monetized Marchex domains. For example, if you do a search for “Arabic” and “measurement” on Google, you will find ads linking to breastenlargementcreams and siliconimplants domains – both owned by Marchex.  Given that almost all the links on these pages are paid with high CPCs –random clickthroughs presumably pump up revenue.

In the screenshots below taken on 11/29/05, see the 4th paid listing on right for “Arabic” and the 2nd and 6th listings for the keyword “measurement”.  Those link to the two Marchex domains with highly monetized Yahoo! keywords.

Arabic_search

Measurement_search

Breast_implant

Breast_enlargement

Hmmm...

I suspect Google would not be pleased with how irrelevant these results are for those terms.  Even more so, I would guess Yahoo! wouldn’t be happy to be sending low quality, irrelevant clicks to their high paying advertisers.  I plan to email some folks at both companies to get their thoughts.

As a Google user and especially as a Yahoo advertiser, I find this very disturbing.  Who knows how much revenue is being generated by these tactics… but it is clearly not sustainable.  It is not organic revenue.  It is likely not even allowed in Google and Yahoo! advertiser and publisher terms of use.

Why would the gem of Marchex’s business need to rely on such sketchy and desperate behavior?  Potential questions:

1. Is the domains business hard to grow? Is this a way to boost revenue on the sly?

2. Is the domains business as profitable as bulls say? How much are they spending on traffic acquisition?

I own puts on MCHX at various prices.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83420861753ef00d834ace78669e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Irrelevant Traffic Arbitrage:

Comments

It's a shame people go to all the trouble to scheme up illegal and harmful ways to make money, when they could put that energy to good use.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Search

  •  

Sponsors

BountyRoll


Disclaimer

  • The posts on this site reflect my opinions, commentary and speculation about stocks, products and companies. Data and analysis are presented as is. I apologize for any inaccuracies, but I cannot guarantee accuracy. Please do your due diligence on all investments you make.

Thanks for Reading